decentralisation of health services in fiji: a decision space analysis
Authors
abstract
background decentralisation aims to bring services closer to the community and has been advocated in the health sector to improve quality, access and equity, and to empower local agencies, increase innovation and efficiency and bring healthcare and decision-making as close as possible to where people live and work. fiji has attempted two approaches to decentralisation. the current approach reflects a model of deconcentration of outpatient services from the tertiary level hospital to the peripheral health centres in the suva subdivision. methods using a modified decision space approach developed by bossert, this study measures decision space created in five broad categories (finance, service organisation, human resources, access rules, and governance rules) within the decentralised services. results fiji’s centrally managed historical-based allocation of financial resources and management of human resources resulted in no decision space for decentralised agents. narrow decision space was created in the service organisation category where, with limited decision space created over access rules, fiji has seen greater usage of its decentralised health centres. there remains limited decision space in governance. conclusion the current wave of decentralisation reveals that, whilst the workload has shifted from the tertiary hospital to the peripheral health centres, it has been accompanied by limited transfer of administrative authority, suggesting that fiji’s deconcentration reflects the transfer of workload only with decision-making in the five functional areas remaining largely centralised. as such, the benefits of decentralisation for users and providers are likely to be limited.
similar resources
Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis
Background Decentralisation aims to bring services closer to the community and has been advocated in the health sector to improve quality, access and equity, and to empower local agencies, increase innovation and efficiency and bring healthcare and decision-making as close as possible to where people live and work. Fiji has attempted two approaches to decentralisation. The current approach refl...
full textLow Decision Space Means No Decentralization in Fiji; Comment on “Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis”
Mohammed, North, and Ashton find that decentralization in Fiji shifted health-sector workloads from tertiary hospitals to peripheral health centres, but with little transfer of administrative authority from the centre. Decisionmaking in five functional areas analysed remains highly centralized. They surmise that the benefits of decentralization in terms of services and outcomes will be limited....
full textDecentralisation, Decision Space and Directions for Future Research; Comment on “Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis”
Decentralisation continues to re-appear in health system reform across the world. Evaluation of these reforms reveals how research on decentralisation continues to evolve. In this paper, we examine the theoretical foundations and empirical references which underpin current approaches to studying decentralisation in health systems.
full textDecision Space and Capacities in the Decentralization of Health Services in Fiji; Comment on “Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis”
The study of decentralization in Fiji shows that increasing capacities is not necessarily related to increasing decision space of local officials, which is in contrast with earlier studies in Pakistan. Future studies should address the relationship among decision space, capacities, and health system performance.
full textdecentralisation, decision space and directions for future research; comment on “decentralisation of health services in fiji: a decision space analysis”
decentralisation continues to re-appear in health system reform across the world. evaluation of these reforms reveals how research on decentralisation continues to evolve. in this paper, we examine the theoretical foundations and empirical references which underpin current approaches to studying decentralisation in health systems.
full textlow decision space means no decentralization in fiji; comment on “decentralisation of health services in fiji: a decision space analysis”
mohammed, north, and ashton find that decentralization in fiji shifted health-sector workloads from tertiary hospitals to peripheral health centres, but with little transfer of administrative authority from the centre. decisionmaking in five functional areas analysed remains highly centralized. they surmise that the benefits of decentralization in terms of services and outcomes will be limited....
full textMy Resources
Save resource for easier access later
Journal title:
international journal of health policy and managementPublisher: kerman university of medical sciences
ISSN
volume 5
issue 3 2016
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023